printSpaceX and Blue Origin are no more efficient at building spacecraft than NASA. But that’s not the point of them
by kleinbl00
Industry-built spacecraft were indeed cheaper, but only for lower-risk projects: the so-called Class C and D missions, where the scientific stakes are modest and the chance of failure is acceptable. Once the analysis moved up to Class A and B missions, the high-profile, flagship science projects where budgets balloon and timelines stretch, the difference evaporated. Nasa and industry came out roughly equal. In some cases, Nasa was cheaper.