I wonder if there was no reaction because China does not really care about US planes and the zone was only meant for Japanese even though they state all non-commercial flights regardless of nationality. Regardless, if things were reversed and China flew unarmed planes through an American no-fly zone, I'm sure the media will make a big deal out of it....described the mission as “uneventful,” saying that there was “no contact, no reaction from China.”
If there is going to be any sort of pushback on the part of America on behalf of its allies or interests (and I can't envision how there conceivably could not be) then I'm actually glad they are doing this now. It's pretty in your face but it is a clear response tied directly to a specific action. Much better than letting the action go unchecked, letting China's influence grow, then stupidly taking a bold stance at a later date after a series of unanswered actions. I'm not endorsing either side, just saying that if you're going to pushback eventually, better early and decisively. I think it's better for everyone. I don't know enough about this conflict to understand who the biggest asshole is (if there is one).
i've said it before and i'll say it again, neither the US nor Japan can afford to do what it takes to make China back down. this isn't about the islands. it's about power. they're pushing this kind of thing several places, not just in the Senkaku islands. it's a deliberate strategy to raise their importance as a global power, and they know they can win.
They cannot win. No one can. They only think they are acting in their own interest. If they want to press the issue, the US could unilaterally destroy their entire fleet in a matter of hours, if they chose. The Chinese have invested a lot of money recently in building their navy, and they would be devastated if they were to lose it all in an instant. But of course the US would stand to lose a lot by taking that step, economically mostly, and perhaps invite destruction on our allies. So all the Chinese are doing is creating a stalemate that can only end poorly. This is not about power in the international community; it is about power at home. True power in the international community is in economics and diplomacy. They are exposing themselves as amateurs here, I'm afraid.
The loss of China's entire navy would be nothing compared to the loss the United States would experience as a consequence of war with a major trade partner. The loss of China's entire navy would be nothing compared to the loss the United States would experience when CSG-5 hits the bottom of the South China Sea. Basically China can push as hard as they want with no fear of the US actually taking action. Economically, China's won. America has invested a lot of money building infrastructure in China. On paper, we're richer, we own them, but ownership on paper isn't real control. Materially, they've got all the factories, and enough of the world's natural resources to make good use of them. If America embargoed tomorrow, China would still have the rest of the world as an export market. Diplomatic power is just a function of military power, don't fool yourself into thinking otherwise.True power in the international community is in economics and diplomacy. They are exposing themselves as amateurs here, I'm afraid.
IMO you overestimate China's power somewhat. Their due to corruption and inefficiencies, their infrastructure isn't nearly as robust as you might think. With Japan and India as allies, the US would have air and naval superiority in time, and thus they could disrupt most trade in and out of China, sinking ships, destroying rail and roads. Bombing the Three Gorges Damn would have tremendous consequences for energy production, other plants would be targeted as well; even before air superiority, the US has a ridiculous amount of submarines packed with missiles. In short, the war would happen in China more than in the US, and China would bear the greater costs. They do have a lot of factories, but the US still has a huge manufacturing sector. Of course, Russia would be a big question mark, but China would be running a losing race in a US/China conflict. Edit: I should add, my wife is Chinese. We travel and visit family there. I never want to see anything like this conflict.
There is no doubt that China needs the US far more than the US needs China. Our economy would suffer while we experienced shortages of some products, but manufacturing capacity is basically fungible. Many of those jobs would return home in short order, and the rest would return to Mexico, or be exported to Brazil or India. Let's not forget also, that we always read that the US is treaty bound to protect Japan, but it's not the US, it's NATO. That means Germany, Britain and France, too, or, you know, all of China's export economy. Of course, I hope that this never happens, as the human cost would be catastrophic. I have many Chinese friends and acquaintances, and I generally love the Chinese people. I just think their government is making a grave miscalculation.
Perhaps amateurs as far as the contemporary mode of what it is to be an international power. It really seems like China is looking to its Imperial past as its model for functioning as an international power, much to everyone's detriment.They are exposing themselves as amateurs here, I'm afraid.
Yes, it's looking to its imperial past so that it can say (implicitly or explicitly), "Look, we are great again." Why do they want to do this? As I said yesterday, I believe they have a lot of internal strife (a huge looming economic calamity, for example) from which they need to deflect the people's attention. What better way to accommodate that end than to stir up trouble with its most hated rival?