I'm almost as veteran as they come.

If you have a problem with an account message thenewgreen or mk and they will help resolve your issue.

You had engaged in no conversation with the community on the account you posted with, you hadn't shared any other posts. You posted Bible chit chat with a brand new account. Not much interest in clearing up misunderstood Bible passages around here. You look like a kooky spammer.

""prepare to be judged on that act and that act alone.” First impressions are everything."

You are so right.

I ask, what is a guy supposed to do in that position? You figuratively led with your chin. I had no real animosity or malice, it was as much a piece of performance art as anything. The guy says it's cool to judge and looks like a spammy kook? OK, I'll bite.

In the aftermath you just had to go with the "I'm not violating the TOS, so you'll just have to deal with it shtick. Oh...yea...an internet lawyer, that is just about the most petulant and unendearing angle to argue the "value" of what you are bringing to the table. It's almost completely bereft of value, it's the bulk of your initial essay at personal redemption. Dictionary definitions, more garbage engagement. I must be wrong, he pulled out his Rand McNally and beat me over the head with it, and how could I judge so harshly, he used good citations!

You are pleased to have picked this as your test post but I would argue that you might have chosen poorly. A God bothering post picking apart aspects of Scripture shows a lack of attention towards the interests of your audience. A post in support of judging things upon their apparent merit when you don't know your audience seems like folly.

You apparently aren't a spammer, just a person who wants to use Hubski as a blog mirror with no real interest in engaging with the wider community. I just can't welcome you here but like the TOS says, have at it.

I am not embarrassed.