So a funny thing happened to me this morning. I shared a picture of a rock and got my life torn apart.
I’ve got ten-year anniversary coming up. That’s an accomplishment. I’ve given over every spare moment to jewelry-making and I’m starting to develop some skill. That’s an accomplishment. And I’ve navigated the strange-and-wonderful world of getting a bespoke faceting job done on a bespoke rough gem so that I can use my skills to create something of personal - not financial - value for someone I love. And as I need to keep it secret for another two months, and as it’s taken a few hundred hours of practice and tens of thousands of dollars to get to this point, I’m definitely over-sensitive to criticism on this front. It being a gift? One I’m really nervous about? One that I’m spending outsized amounts of time and effort on? Let’s call it over-sensitive squared.
I just shared a picture of the fuckin’ rock without a whole lot of backstory. Okay, a little. And what I got was snark from someone I like. Which was backed up with a share from someone else I like. I blocked ‘em both and nearly inactivated my account.
I mentioned last week that online betrayals are the worst kind of betrayals because online interactions are the worst kind of interactions: that’s not a human in front of you, that’s a cardboard cutout with quotes and all the “human” aspects we eagerly, slavishly build on it so we feel like we’re talking to another person are assembled out of our own psyche. When our model fails us the world has failed us.
I never forgave ‘wage for slagging on a gift I gave my wife. I tried. Several times. Reached out over IRC, reached out over PM, but she reserved the right to hate on my shit whenever the mood struck her because, you see, she was poor.
That I was once poor didn’t fucking matter: that I could easily be poor again didn’t matter either. I was no longer poor and therefore, any object, endeavor or preoccupation I partook of would be judged by her on a relative economic scale and the deeper in the shitter her life was, the more judgement she would pass.
And none of this makes any sense if you think classism is dead in America, some vintage thing we left at the Tea Party. After all, every movie you’ve ever seen, every book you’ve ever read about the kid from the wrong side of the tracks gives you a happy ending about love conquering all and we’re all the same deep down. It’s demographically useful; when you show the rich people and the poor people getting along you make the rich people and the poor people happy because we’re not monsters, are we? Americans have all been equal since the Emancipation Proclamation except for certain notable flukes that we will study as flukes and mention in passing as the exceptions that prove the rule American exceptionalism is alive and well.
_____________________________________________
You don’t think you’re asking for permission to like something when you show it to your friends, but you are. You’re asking “does this align with our shared values?” Make a list of your five closest friends. Write down what you think their salaries are. Average them. Congratulations. You just wrote down how much you make in a year.
My financial planner once explained country clubs as places people with money could go to not feel bad about having money. We’re sold on this American Dream of equal opportunity but we look around and we make more money than our gardener, than our babysitter, than the cashier. We make less money than the people whose grass we cut, the people whose kids we watch, the people whose groceries we bag. And that is never going to fucking change. We know it. We don’t believe it but we know it.
I shared objects that were handmade by people I like as gifts for someone I dearly love. But to the casual observer they were bourgeois bullshit. Because (A) the casual observer didn’t like it (B) the casual observer wouldn’t spend that much on it.
The casual observer can afford a lot less than they used to.
You know what a hipster is? A hipster is someone who spends more money than you would on stuff you don’t want, and who spends nothing on the stuff you do. A hipster is someone whose social identity is curbed by financial circumstance so they buttress it through financial choice.
You know what makes a luxury brand? The ability to convince someone you’re worth it. Here’s a $7000 necklace:
Here’s a $20 necklace:
The former is a Van Cleef & Arpels Alhambra. They’ve been selling that shit for 50 years. The latter is some Etsy bullshit. The materials cost of the two are about the same. There sure ain’t $7k worth of materials or labor into the VC&A but it’s a VC&A and to anybody who knows jewelry, it’s pedigreed. There’s definitely $7k worth of boutiques and salespeople and brand identity and heritage; I’ve lately learned that in luxury goods, you get to go from “local” to “international” without passing through “national” because if you aren’t in Paris, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Beverly Hills, Sydney and Bombay you might as well be in Macy’s.
That is most definitely a business model deserving of rejection and mockery if you aren’t in the market for $7k worth of white enamel. But knock a couple decimal points off of the situation and we’re closer to the subject at hand.
William Gibson said something like “most people are comfortable living about ten years in the past.” That’s where “future shock” comes from.
A hipster is someone who makes his economic situation his identity.
__________________________________________________________
Last week, Twitter introduced me to Beau Brummell. Now I’m going to introduce you. See, before Beau Brummell managed to suck up to the Prince of Wales, dudes dressed like this:
After Brummell died, dudes dressed like this:
See, courtiers had to buy their own shit and Brummell was only rich compared to most people, not compared to royalty so he got really good at slagging on everyone else for how “fancy” they dressed until everyone was walking around in black, just like him. Note that he didn’t dress poor:
- Brummell took a house on Chesterfield Street in Mayfair and for a time managed to avoid the nightly gaming and other extravagances fashionable in such elevated circles. Where he refused to economise was on his dress: when asked how much it would cost to keep a single man in clothes, he was said to have replied: "Why, with tolerable economy, I think it might be done with £800." That amount is approximately £52,000 ($67,000) in 2016 currency; the average wage for a craftsman at that time was £52 a year. He also claimed that he took five hours a day to dress and recommended that boots be polished with champagne.This preoccupation with dress, coupled with a nonchalant display of wit, was referred to as dandyism.
“Formal dress” looks like Mad Men instead of Pee Wee’s Playhouse because of Hipsters. “I reject your values and substitute my own.” The whole thing falls apart if you can’t get anyone to agree with you, though, so groupthink is important.
Snark is important.
Scoring points is important.
Your shit can’t have value unless you can make everything else worthless.
______________________________________________________________
One of the most formative purchases I’ve ever made was a Kawasaki Ninja. I was seventeen. It was a ZX1000R with a speedo that went to (a deeply aspirational) 230MPH. And it was this heinous lime yellow; I never actually even rode it, I just got it for a bargain from a friend going to jail. However, the simple act of getting on it was inexpressibly vital. I fuckin’ felt like a man on that thing. Which isn’t surprising, it was basically a 460lb penis. I realized it. Right there. And suddenly blasted The Cure as loud as I could and danced around like a little girl. If my concept of masculinity could be shaped that easily by a material object, then maybe my concept of masculinity was too plastic to concern myself with. Dance like it’s fun.
Hipsters are people who haven’t seen the illusion. They’re the people whose identity is determined by their stuff, or more importantly the lack thereof. If they can’t have it, then it must not be worth it and anybody who wants it isn’t worth it either. This is why “hipster” and “bougie” are never anything but pejoratives. No one ever thinks of themselves as a hipster and other peoples’ stuff is bougie, ours is valuable. Unless we know someone is going to call us out on it in which case we cry “jinx!” and beat them to it so we can ironically enjoy that thing that we would enjoy without the irony.
Some sociologist - might be Packer, might not - argued that Americans are the largest nomadic tribe the world has ever seen, which is why we’re such materialists. We have no tie to the land, we have no heritage where we live, we move hundreds of miles away from where we grew up, from the people we know, from the places we love and the only thing we have to identify with is our stuff. Thus, the easiest thing to identify with someone else over is more stuff. The easiest way to assess someone else is their stuff. The easiest way to tell who someone is is their stuff.
A man tells the world who he is four ways: his house, his wife, his car and his shoes.
- Warren Adler, War of the Roses
Our stuff has a story. If it’s a recognized brand, that brand tells its story for us. If it’s not, we have to do it ourselves. Your Mephisto shoes? The people who know shoes know something about you. The combat boots you bought on your Semester At Sea before you graduated to your shitty job living with five strangers sharing a bathroom? The people who know you know something about your shoes. GEMSTONES? Gemstones aren’t allowed to have history. That shit’s bougie by definition. Best pay penance to the Church of Adbusters lest we strike you from the rolls, comrade.
_________________________________________________________________________
You’re unblocked (you know who you are, assuming you noticed). I’m sorry for overreacting. Thanks for teaching me something about me, something about you, and something about the world. Problem is, though, is the less I think I know you the less I care what you think and I know less about you now than I did this morning.
Chloe Kardashian made the Forbes list this year. Her cosmetics have made her a billion dollars. She’s 23. She beat Zuckerberg by two years. Lots of people hate her for their stuff. Sometimes people hate me for mine. That's new. I'm not used to it. I'm not comfortable with it. But I recognized that I need to be.
My wife showed me a Facebook video of some earnest young white dude excoriating us all for using sponges. ‘cuz they don’t recycle. True Believers chop up old towels and scrub with them (reduce re-use recycle). My wife commented that it sure would be nice if the people who aren’t busy being the serenest got something other than castigated for not being properly pure of heart. But we don’t. If you’re not with us, you’re with the terrorists. Same as it ever was. Bernie Sanders isn’t left enough therefore he’s an enemy of the people. And if I like something your socioeconomic class isn’t allowed to like, I’m an enemy.
Country clubs are places for people who don’t want to feel bad about having money. And the hipster shall inherit the earth.
I just wish we didn’t pick enemies based on where they spend their money.
I admire that a small interaction can trigger this much reflection. Also, as an aside, I still often think of you whenever I buy a Macchiato. "I wonder if kb would think this one tastes like battery acid." I once read an article that argued that the difference between people who aren't good with money and those that are comes down to how they perceive it. The former view it as fuel for their lifestyle. They get paid and can get takeaway food again, go out drinking multiple times a week, and buy that PS4 game. And when the tank is empty they live on ramen until the next paycheck fills it up again. The latter view it as building blocks to the kind of life they want to live. So if they want to be the kind of person who can buy a quality $400 backpack, they budget, save, and live modestly. Eventually, the time comes when they afford the backpack without worrying whether it means they're going to get scurvy. I think this difference in perception feeds into how the former view the latter when they buy an expensive item. All the person who's bad with money sees some is out-of-touch, bougie asshole frittering $400 worth of premium life fuel on a bag. "If I can salvage a ratty old bag off the floor and replace the parts that keep breaking, why can't they?" And the resentment builds. Never mind the fact that any normal person has to carefully build their life in order to safely afford such an item. Never mind the fact that they bought it for its quality craftsmanship and ethics and not purely as a status symbol. Never mind that it will last a lifetime and still be in as good a condition as the day it was bought. There's just a fundamental perception gap which becomes filled with negativity. I'm not sure if I'm completely committed to this point of view yet. I know it generalises and misses out on some nuance. But I think it stands up to some scrutiny.
"There's an old Yiddish saying that people regard money one of three ways: as blood, to nourish; as semen, to create, or as shit to be thrown away." - Julia Phillips, You'll Never Eat Lunch In This Town Again I think it's simpler than you think. I think it's a scarcity mentality. I think that if you have the option to spend more money on something you're less pissed off at the people who exercise their options differently. I think that if you've already got your money earmarked for things you need rather than things you want, you resent anything that people want but don't need. I've been mixing reality television for like twelve years now. That means twelve years of listening to people talk candidly about how they'd spend their prize money if they win. I'd say 3/4ths of them start with "pay off debt." If your view of a sweepstakes is as a way to return to zero, you have a damaged relationship with money. And I don't think that's your fault. I think Western society is one where consumption is celebrated, where resources are limited and there is absolutely zero fucking sympathy for the people who can't catch a break. Wanna see the worst commercial in the world? These are Millennials. They're spending all their money on avocado toast. Fortunately Wells Fargo will give them a nice, stern,'free financial health conversation' to make them feel bad enough to eat cold, sauceless pasta in the dark. Freeze-frame on their savings account. They've got $12k in the bank, "100%" of their down-payment on a house. Which considering they're buying from a pirogi truck means they're either buying a used single-wide 90 minutes from where they dine or the food scene in rural Kentucky is far more eclectic than we've been led to believe. The question you want to have is "how do you spend money?" and I think for far, far too many people, the answer is "stop tormenting me with your thought experiments."I once read an article that argued that the difference between people who aren't good with money and those that are comes down to how they perceive it.
Wife - check House - check Car - don’t have one Shoes - just bought a new pair of sneakers Gotta get a fucking car. You’re a badass. Don’t need someone else to tell you that, unless that someone else is me. Aside and in no way related: just had a realization. I’m by myself, eating tapas and drinking a Manhattan in midtown Manhattan. If I could have anyone with me right now, sharing this moment, it would be my wife. That’s a comforting thought after 15 years together. If I could have 4 people i would invite you and Mrs. KB. Onward!
"don't have one" is a social signal, and not a bad one. People were convinced that Stanley Kubrick, eccentric genius, hated driving. It added to his mythos. That he owned and drove a 911 Carrera was something completely ignored by everyone because it made him less of an eccentric genius. This isn't about me, though. I mean, it is, but it's more about an insight I had into American materialist culture and how Hipsterism is a reaction to diminished resources without diminished pride. Class shit digs deep. I've driven a 911 for over a year now. People say "nice car" about it more than anything else I've ever owned. I'm quick to respond with "and you wouldn't believe how cheap it was" and call it my "schadenporsche" so I can bring up how much real Porsche owners hate my little silver Miata-on-steroids. "Nice car" is another way of saying "are you sure that's your tax bracket?" This is Max Brusser. Max was the former head of luxury watches at Harry Winston. In 2006 he started his own luxury brand, MB&F - "Max Brusser & Friends." He's an inspiration. His watches are tweaky, novel, sci-fi-inspired and expensive as fuck. A few months ago on Instagram he had all the Horological Machines - the limited-edition supertweak $100k-plus watch designs of the past ten years - lined up for display. Someone commented "nice collection!" Max Brusser, founder of a luxury watch brand, former head of a division at Harry Winston, said "I wish! What do you think I am, made out of money?" Signaling cuts deep.